CTRL + D · Subscribe to Movie Reviews | Music Reviews | Behind the HypeNews Feed ·Subscribe to Movie Reviews | Music Reviews | Behind the HypeComments

Do you Believe in the 14th Amendment?

November 5, 2008 by Redmanthatcould  
Filed under Social Commentary

If you do believe in the 14th Amendment, then unfortunately you can only relate to the minority of the voters of California. The reason being is that Proposition 8 passed with a 52 – 48 percent difference, thus banning gay marriage. As I write this, I am both ashamed and embarrassed to be a California native. It came as no surprise that similar propositions banning gay marriage, in Arizona and Florida passed, but I thought for sure California would pull through. I still shake my head in shock, not understanding how this could happen.

The saddest part of it all is that people voting for proposition 8 (that is, voting to ban gay marriage) really have no idea what kind of ramifications it has on the people who are legitimately affected. Those voting for proposition 8 went to bed as normal last night, woke up today as normal, and will continue leading their lives with no change. What would have happened if they voted no on proposition 8, and it actually got rejected? I assume the same conclusion as stated above. But what happens to all the gay and lesbian couples in California? Well, they cry themselves to sleep, feeling betrayed and abandoned by seemingly the most reasonable, forward-thinking state in the Union. What would you feel if 5.4 million of your fellow residents said you are legally beneath them?

In case I have not been clear, and you are wondering which way I voted, here you go:

Voting No on Proposition 8 because the 14th Amendment is Irreplaceable

Voting No on Proposition 8 because the 14th Amendment is Irreplaceable

My guess is that most people are unfamiliar with the 14th Amendment, or simply choose to look past it. I hope the California Supreme Court remembers it, and I hope this ass-backwards proposition gets reversed. For those of you who might be unfamiliar with the language in the 14th Amendment, I have it for you here:

Section 1.

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

In my humble opinion, that is as clear as day: equal protection of the laws. Then I thought to myself, “Self, what if you are getting confused by ‘equal’?” That very well may be the case. Perhaps I am just mistaken by my idea of equal; I mean, I was not an English major after all, and I am only human, so perhaps I am making a grave error in judgment. Luckily for me, I have this series of tubes available at my finger tips, which tells me right from wrong, and defines words for me too. So I looked up the definition, and to my surprise, this is what I found:

equal –adjective

  1. as great as; the same as (often followed by to or with)
  2. like or alike in quantity, degree, value, etc.; of the same rank, ability, merit, etc.

By Jove, I was right all along! So I might be taking this for granted, but I consider marriage a privilege (it could be an immunity, but who uses that word in this context anymore?). If states are not supposed to abridge privileges, and we are all equally protected under the law, then shouldn’t the privilege of marriage be unabridged to gay couples, as it is to straight couples? Really, the only sensible thing would be to simply outlaw marriage entirely, or make it legal for everyone, in the same way, regardless of their sexual orientation.

After work, I decided to stop by one of the street corners where people were actively protesting proposition 8. To be honest, I really just wanted to hear what someone for proposition 8 had to say, but since there were a few people out there against it, I decided to chat with them briefly as well. Here is my version of street reporting:

You ask someone if they believe in a law, and they answer with a passage from the Bible. At least I think it is from the Bible, since I have not read the book I can only guess. Not to say that everyone that voted for banning gay marriage is a religious zealot, or that they even care one way or another if gay people can marry; maybe they just saw one of the scare tactic ads, and were driven by emotion.

If you happened to vote yes on proposition 8, and just so happen to stumble upon this little site, I want you to do me a favor. What I want you to do is think about the impact your vote has had on you, and what impact it has had on gay humans in California. Think about how it would feel if the shoe were on the other foot, and people decided that right X, Y, or Z no longer applies to you; not because you are a criminal, an immigrant, or not mentally sound, but simply because you are you.

Remember, they are human before they are gay, before they are citizens, before they are doctors saving your life, before they are teachers educating your kids, before they are actors entertaining you. You just gave several thousand humans the high hat, and told them to fuck off.

At the end of the day, they are humans, just like you and me. What makes you so special?

About Redmanthatcould

If you have any questions, comments, or want to write for BTH, shoot me an email. I like large breasts, so feel free to send me pictures of yours (men, please send your photos to Flak - flak@behindthehype.com). Email me!

Comments

2 Comments on "Do you Believe in the 14th Amendment?"

  1. Lenny on Thu, 6th Nov 2008 1:22 am 

    That crazy bitch scares me.

    I wish I was there though…

    Sanctity of marriage. What a fucken joke. Or is she saying that divorce’s should be outlawed?

    Only men and women should marry so they can bring children into the world? What about barren women? Or men with slow swimmers? Should be relegated to solitary existences?

    And guess what lady, the gay folks can still have kids. Clay Aiken and Rosie O’Donnell immediately spring to mind.

    I would have made that bitch cry.

    And to the No on 8 dude, with the gay friends: love is love – Amen to that Brother!

    Aside from all the Yes on 8 bigots, I’m afraid that there was probably a good portion of ignorant people that unwittingly voted yes, thinking that a yes vote meant they were in favor of gay marriage.

    I don’t think it’ll stand, but who knows.

  2. Spazarella on Thu, 6th Nov 2008 9:29 am 

    I’m scared, waiting for those absentee ballots to be counted. I find it FIERCELY ironic that the day that our country votes for it’s first black president that we even consider limiting the rights of fellow citizens. How are we NOT PAST this?
    Not to mention the egregious and flagrant display of the collusion of church and state. Did the bigots in my southern homeland once claim that god didn’t want equality for minorities??? Doesn’t that sound crazy now??? Don’t we now only hear crazy things like that from Neo-Nazi Psychopaths??? I cannot stomach this.
    OH! But hey! The Pigs and Chickens won an overwhelming vote to improve their quality of life. Thank goodness! Let’s make sure we dole out ethical treatment to our dinner first!

Leave your creative spam below.
If you want a cutesy little picture to show with your spam, go get a gravatar!





// Around The Site -->
  • BtH Contests / Giveaways

  • Behind the Hype Polls

    Are you BtH?

    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...
  • Click these ads now

  • Add BtH on Facebook

  • Slideshow

      Get the Flash Player to see the slideshow.
  • Behind the Hype Friends

  • BtH Archives

  • Copyright © 2009 BehindtheHype.com · Movie Reviews · Music Reviews · Privacy Policy · Terms of Use · Sitemap